Apr 21 2009

Who needs journalists when we’ve got bloggers?

I’ve just listened to episode 190 of This Week in Tech (TWiT), where the assorted experts laid into people considering a career in journalism. I’m paraphrasing here, but the conclusion the guests came to was that the pay sucks (duh!), journalism degrees are expensive (aren’t they all), newspapers are closing hand over fist (sure are), and there’s no need for journalism when we’ve got blogging (WTF!). Let’s get one thing straight: blogging does not make you a journalist, but we’ll get onto that later.

John C. Dvorak, a grumpy tech hack, went one step further during the podcast, by claiming that traditional journalism is dead, and that opinion-based blogging is the future (think I’ll just kill myself now).

“But hold on, you could be right, John. When Gillian Tett was busy poring over financial iregularities for months on end, she should have been blogging, and maybe producing her own podcast. Yeah, that would have been soooo cool. Gillian is a frickin’ dinosaur, man! Objective, fact-based reporting is antiquated, and there’s no place for it on the intehnets.” That’s one response I could reply to Dvorak’s claim with. It would make me a fucking idiot, but it’s a reply. Anyway, I digress; back to the podcast.

The first thing that struck me whilst listening to this show was that I’ve heard it al before. In fact, journalism has been getting a concerted kicking by ‘new media experts’ for months. For example, Jeff Jarvis regularly revels in traditional media’s decline, and - as a result - is now loathed by many journalists, as this Slate article illustrates. Jarvis is paid a lot of money to talk about journalism, and in this choice quote he gives his views on the subject:

The fall of journalism is, indeed, journalists’ fault. It is our fault that we did not see the change coming soon enough and ready our craft for the transition. It is our fault that we did not see and exploit—hell, we resisted—all the opportunities new media and new relationships with the public presented.

Then Sarah Lacy, a columnist at TechCrunch, weighed in, and wrote this article on how journalism schools are stuffy, and akin to ‘foot binding’. (Seriously, that’s what she said.) Sarah’s friend did a journalism degree and no longer has a job; Sarah didn’t get a journalism degree, and she’s, like, writing for TechCrunch. Take that, journo bitch! And Sarah’s doing, like, totally awesome interviews with tech GODS such as Facebook’s founder Mark Zuckerberg. Check out her SKILLZ!

So there you go, journalism is becoming a dirty word amongst the social media set. Thanks to the internet we’re all publishers now, but that doesn’t make us all journalists. At this point you may acuse me of hubris, and being a snobby journalist (hey, stop laughing at the back), but I’m far from it. I’ve commissioned writers with no degree in journalism. In fact, some of the best writers I know have no formal qualifications. But I tell you what they have done, and that’s graft. They’ve grafted their arses off, and they’ve learned their craft the hard way, just as those people that take years out of their lives to complete journalism degrees and work placements do. I recently filled out a questionaire for a PR proffessional, where one of the questions concerned the affect of social media on journalism. This was my reply:

I trained as a journalist for three years at University, and did various work placements on newspapers for another two. In that time I learned about fact checking, staying on the right side of the law, ethics, story structure, interview technique, and many other skills that take time to learn. I’m not saying these skills can’t be acquired, but it takes time. I think the ease of publishing online means that many people are now calling themselves journalists, without knowing the  fundamentals of journalism; that’s a concern. However, if you’re talking about the ways in which social media can add to a jornalist’s arsenal, it’s had an amazing effect. Twitter, for example, has enabled non-linear news stories to be covered in truly engaging ways (The Guardian’s G20 coverage being a perfect example). Add to this the feedback you can get via social media, and the audio and video tools that enable you to publish content on the go, and there’s never been a more exciting time to be a journalist.

And I completely stand by this. In my opinion, journalism isn’t dead, and I would never dissuade someone from following their dreams. When it comes to trying to secure a writing gig, that degree could be the thing that swings a job your way. And the future? Well, the publishing medium may have changed, but which are the sites dominating the news landscape? That’s right, traditional news organisations that get the internet. So, you may not be seeing your work in print when you finish your degree, but don’t give up on journalism just yet - it might come in handy.


Dec 23 2008

How I use Twitter (and why I love it)

I’ve had some interesting discussions recently about the merits of Twitter, and the best ways to use it. Some believe it to be the biggest waste of time since the Tamagotchi, others are evangelical in their praise.
For my part, I’ve had a mixed relationship with Twitter. When I first started hearing about the service, I have to admit that I was sceptical. I created an account, and - after finding friends on Twitter by cross-referencing my Gmail address book with Twitter’s database of users – posts/tweets started to roll in. Someone was having eggs for breakfast, another friend was stuck on public transport, a colleague had watched a film last night, which, they assured all their followers, was really good. Was this it? Twitter seemed like the perfect delivery mechanism for the banal; however, I decided to stick it out. And, after a few days, something strange happened. As more people started to follow me, and I them (as I like to operate on a quid pro quo basis), Twitter became more valuable. The first place I now heard about news stories was via Twitter, I found some posts genuinely entertaining, I realised that Twitter was a great sounding board, and - from a work perspective - I was also able to connect directly with readers (some of whom were followers, and some of whom were found via search.twitter.com).
So my usage has become a mix of entertainment, news-gathering, marketing, research and more besides. Today, if I hear someone bitching about Twitter, I usually have an example to hand of how useful it can be, but that’s not to say it’s without its limitations. As things stand, I only have a few hundred followers, and I have no trouble following that many people in kind. But, using the main site, there’s a limit to the number of people you can follow, because the stream of tweets will eventually become a torrent (some users only follow a handful of people, despite having thousands following them, for this very reason – at least that’s why they say they only follow a handful of people). However, to my mind, by only following a small group of people you’re totally missing the true potential of Twitter, potential that can now be realised thanks to great tools such as TweetDeck, which enables you to group followers. By grouping followers you can either view all the people following you, or opt for more specific filtering (such as school friends or drinking buddies); now, the overload excuse no longer holds any water. With TweetDeck I can now choose between viewing all my followers, but can also create smaller groups so I don’t miss anything from close friends and colleagues. Now I can manage Twitter into consumable chunks, no matter how many followers I have, and take my Twittering to the next level.

You can find me at www.twitter.com/danoliver


Nov 21 2008

Google launches Gmail themes

It has to be said, the Gmail interface is dull as crap. With this thought clearly at the forefront of their minds, Google’s developers released a host of new themes this week. Also, it looks like it won’t be long before you’ll be able to design your own … maybe.

Read the full article at Tech Radar.


Nov 4 2008

Zombies don’t run!

Dead Set

Last week saw Channel 4 air a week-long zombiefest, in the shape of Dead Set. Written by Charlie Brooker, and set during a season of Big Brother, the show had been seriously hyped, and - as a horror fan - I was really looking forward to it. Bring on the splatter!
Dead Set had a decent script, some seriously gruesome set pieces, and - if it hadn’t been for one thing - it would have provided some great, zombie entertainment. But that one thing wasn’t a small problem, it was one of those problems that looms over you, and makes you want to kick it in its pendulous bollocks to get it out of the way: zombies DON’T run! I spent a fair while explaining to my work colleagues exactly why this spoilt Dead Set for me, and for the most part they listened sympathetically, and nodded as I patiently waited for them to concur. I could go on and explain the problems I have with running zombies, but Simon Pegg’s column in the Guardian sums up my thoughts perfectly; and he’s far more eloquent than I could ever be. Have a read.


Jul 31 2008

New arrival!

daisy.jpg
She’s the bomb!

For those that don’t know, on June the 12th I became the proud daddy of a baby girl - Daisy May Oliver. The last few weeks have been spent frantically trying to balance baby, work, pets, home, and anything else you care to think of, so not surprisingly blog posts have taken a backseat.

Ahhhhh yes, the blog.

I’m actually thinking about either ditching, or at least changing the focus of my current blog. To date this site has largely been made up of random wibbles, and I’ve already toyed with the idea of canning it once. But that would be a little extreme. So the blog will stay, but with more of a focus on what I actually spend most of my working life doing - writing, commissioning, and editing.

Hopefully it’ll be of use to some people, and if it’s not, then there’s a decent archive of flotsam and jetsam to trawl through!


May 23 2008

Review: Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
Indy’s back!

Fans of the Indiana Jones series have been anticipating The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull with giddy excitement, and a considerable slice of fear. Would the movie totally miss the mark, have an awful script, and rely too heavily on CGI effects and en vogue directional techniques? And could we cope if another beloved 80s franchise was horrifically re-imagined?Thankfully, any fears that fans may have had can now be cast into the snake pit; Indy’s back, and he’s better than ever! (Well, better than he was in Temple of Doom and The Last Crusade, anyway.)

Both Lucas and Spielberg have stayed true to the original Indy movies, eschewing CGI in favour of live action, and ensuring consistency between all four films. What this also means is that - at times - things get a little rough around the edges. But that’s great! As for the plot, I won’t give away too much, but the Reds have replaced the Nazis, Shia LaBeouf can do no wrong as Indy’s sidekick, there are some great reveals and nods to past installments, and the opening scene proves that Harrison Ford can still mix it up (even if he doesn’t move quite so fast as he used to).

As with all the Indiana Jones films, you need to leave your disbelief at the door - because the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull plot is, quite frankly, insane - but watching this movie is like returning to an old haunt, only to find that your favourite beer is still on tap, the same songs are playing on the jukebox, and pickled eggs are still on the snack roster.

In short, if you love Indiana Jones, then you’ll be grinning from start to finish, and humming that tune for days to come!


May 19 2008

Rossi hits 90!

Valentino Rossi was on stunning form yesterday, as he won the Le Mans MotoGP, bagged his 90th victory, and joined Angel Nieto in joint second place for the most career victories (with only Giacomo Agostini ahead of him, on 122).

Viewed by many as the greatest rider of all time, Rossi was back to his best, and clearly felt comfortable with his bike set up. All the talk of Rossi’s so-called risky decision to go with Bridgestone tyres was forgotten, as Rossi gave a Le Mans masterclass.

This was Rossi’s first back-to-back victory since 2006, and he was clearly delighted with the result. But the delight came with a healthy dose of relief. (Rossi has always had a massive respect for the sport, and those that went before him, so it was no surprise that he wanted to mark his 90th victory in a special way. However, no one expected Rossi to stop on his victory lap, and have Angel Nieto ride him back to the paddock - sporting a set of commemorative leathers.)

“I had quite a lot of pressure because Angel was waiting with the special leathers to join me on the bike, so I really needed to win,” Rossi told the BBC.

The title race is now on a knife-edge, and it would be a brave man to bet against Rossi. Whether he’s the greatest will probably never be agreed upon, but one thing’s for sure: he’s back!

World championship standings:

1 V Rossi (It) 97 pts
2 D Pedrosa (Sp) 94
= J Lorenzo (Sp) 94
4 C Stoner (Aus) 56
5 C Edwards (US) 47
6 L Capirossi (It) 42
7 N Hayden (USA) 37
8 A Dovizioso (It) 36
9 J Toseland (GB) 33
10 S Nakano (Jpn) 28


Apr 3 2008

There’s good money in design

We’ve got a guy called Matthew Dent to thank for the new designs which are set to appear on British coins from this Summer. Dent beat off competition from 4,000 designers that entered a competition to design the currency, and bagged himself £35,000 for his trouble (a mere snip when you consider London’s Olympic logo cost £400,000). And the best thing about this whole story? Well, the coins look fantastic! You can check out Matthew Dent’s jigsaw designs at the Royal Mint’s website.


Jan 25 2008

Loud adverts *update*

I complained about loud adverts. I got this reply:

Thank you for your recent complaint about the sound levels in ads. I’m sorry to hear that this has caused you concern.

We are aware that there can appear to be significant differences between the sound levels in ads and some programmes. The problem lies in the fact that many ads nowadays are compressed (i.e. the quieter parts have been amplified so the ad as a whole seems loud even though it doesn’t exceed the maximum level allowed). That situation can be exacerbated if the ads are shown during relatively quiet programmes. This general problem can’t be solved by action on individual ads, but needs a broad policy change.

We are currently looking at the Code rule and the guidance notes to see whether they need to be reviewed. We have advised the broadcasters that we will monitor complaints over the coming months and contact them regarding potential breaches but that we will, in most cases, deal with these complaints informally; i.e. without publication of any breaches. The existing rule is an old one and isn’t very effective against compressed ads and we’re in the middle of a consultation on a new rule which should make it clearer to broadcasters the standards they should be applying. The consultation ended in August and a new rule should follow in due course.

I note that you have not given us a specific example of a particularly loud ad. We have been advised that in order to investigate sound levels at present we will require details of a specific ad, because we need to obtain the tape from the advertisers directly. If you do come across an instance of a particularly loud ad, please contact us again having made a note of the date, time, channel, platform (e.g. satellite/cable/terrestrial) and the product advertised and we will contact the broadcaster for their comments. In the meantime, please be assured that the general matter is being re-assessed.

I would like to thank you for taking the time to contact us with your concerns. Complaints such as yours have provided much of the impetus for the review of the rule.

Neil Burrows
Complaints Executive


Jan 16 2008

Massive chopper etc. etc.